Yesterday, have informed us that we wanted to make our action more effective publicity and have set all the competent authorities in writing.
However, one might think that some fear has arisen before us. Differently We explain at least not that we kobinet the messages have to see that the path regrets the incident with Robert .
It would have been nice if they had contacted us and the apology had been sent directly to Robert.
More important than the regrets of the incident, however, is fundamentally to bring the situation under scrutiny. It is still an open question as to why Robert had to arrange his departure at all yourself? Or why the train - with the information of the defective elevator - could not enter on the adjacent track? Or why nobody wanted to feel responsible? There is
still much work needed to trigger a fundamental rethinking. Because we have the next case is one in which the mobility service is denied ...
Information was today at BIZEPS-INFO published.
0 comments:
Post a Comment